5 Comments »

Matthew E. Slaven said:
Casspriano’s book is scientifically and philosophically sound as best as my young mind can tell, but I don’t recommend this book. Its scattered with numerous pages of advertising about how his “program” works and how it compares to other religions and spiritual movements. Why must this author physically write out “The Simplest Path” in reference to his book every other page, and talk about his second volume? Perhaps because he’s not out for pure truth, but for our money.
All this book comes down to after you strip away the nonsense is two things. First, admit that you don’t truly know anything. Second, know yourself. Do those two things (they essentially both mean to question EVERYTHING), and you’ll have Casspriano’s “Planetary Awakening,” with 15 bucks still in your pocket. And you’ll be following the fundamental truths already said by Socrates.. so do yourself a favor and pick up Plato’s “Apology” and read up on the Socratic dialogue on how to live a good life. And don’t stop there, because you can’t be sure he’s right.
And I have 10 bucks that says these other couple of reviews were written by the book publisher. In any case, ignore the hype.
Rating: 1 / 5
# 21 February 2010 at 6:42 pm

J. Soria said:
May be I’m wrong but it looks (to me) like the good reviews you can read about this book here come from friends of the author. For me there’s no other explanation about a good review of this book.

It’s just a waste of time. Memes? There’s no possible awakening, by changing or eliminating them, because memes belongs to the mind and the true awakening doesnt. As simple as this, no more explanations needed.
Rating: 1 / 5
# 21 February 2010 at 8:33 pm

zim_reader said:
Can’t stop reading this book! Everything he says rings a big bell in my consciousness. I’d have given the book 5 stars, or even more, but for the difficulty in reading it. Mr. Casspriano writes in LONG sentences. For instance, on page 11 is a sentence that is 11 lines long, containing 14 commas and two dashes. Sometimes I have to read the same sentence over and over. By the time I’ve gotten to the end of it, I’ve forgotten the beginning. Mr. Casspriano could easily break up his extraordinarily long sentences into smaller bites, to make his work more readable. That said, I can’t wait for his next book!! Thanks so much for sharing!
Rating: 4 / 5
# 21 February 2010 at 9:51 pm

Lawrence Dolnick said:
After reading the commentary attached to the one star rating given by the young man from Texas, I feel compelled to step forward in defense of this very fine book. With only one exception, every point made in that negative review is simply wrong. Just not factually correct. The reviewer identifies himself as a young man (… “to my young mind”), and since all of his other Amazon reviews are of TV episodes on DVD, video games and rock music CDs I take him at his word. Well, I am an “old man,” closing in on my sixty-third birthday, and I came to Mr. Casspriano’s book after six decades of life experience, the last three of those decades a zealous practitioner of Zen Buddhism. I say this not to “brag,” but simply to qualify myself as a reviewer before beginning.
I’ll start where the one star reviewer closed his argument, with his statement that the simplest path reduces to two Socratic concepts: “Admit that you don’t know anything” and “know yourself.”
The first part is nominally true (the exception). Like Zen Buddhism, a central tenet of the simplest path is working to release the false notion we all hold that we know ourselves, other people, the world around us. But identifying and releasing our attachments to our illusions is a life’s work, not some brash “I don’t know nothin’!” as the young Texan seems to imply. Under normal circumstances, we go about our daily lives with no idea we are deluded about anything, as Maya (the illusion of the phenomenal world around and even inside us) is so convincing that most of us never even think to question its validity. Casspriano did not invent the notion of human beings being trapped in illusion, as this truth was known to the timeless authors of the Hindu Vedas and is central to all schools of Buddhism (not just Zen). But his scientific/spiritual exploration of the mechanism by which Maya ensnares our minds and can, with effort, be overcome is among the best “plain English” explanations of this process I have read. There is no “inscrutable mystery” in the simplest path (a criticism that has been accurately leveled toward Zen Buddhism, as a lot of Eastern thought truly does come off as “inscrutable” when translated into English and/or the metaphors of Western culture). Casspriano lays out in no-nonsense American English exactly what our brains are doing when they create the illusion we mistake for reality, then shows the reader in the same clear terms how to train his or her brain to break free of illusion and taste reality as-it-is. In just 216 pages, that is no mean feat. After thirty years of Zen practice and numerous kensho experiences (of varying depths and intensities), I can say from personal experience that Casspriano is correct. Enlightenment comes as the fruit of a long, incremental process of retraining the mind to touch reality in a new way, and the process described in the simplest path is the same as that followed in Zen practice, especially Rienzi Zen koan study (I’ll have more to say about this in a later paragraph). Casspriano’s approach and language is very different from traditional Zen (more “scientific,” and no sitting meditation is required), which I think would appeal to Americans and other Westerners seeking to experience “awakening” without necessarily committing themselves to a religion like Buddhism, but the internal mental/spiritual process and final destination are the same.
“Know yourself,” on the other hand, is not in this book at all, at least not in the way the young reviewer, or Socrates for that matter, uses the phrase. As in Buddhism, Casspriano takes pains to demonstrate that “self” is as much of an illusion as our misapprehension of the phenomenal world, and is a byproduct of exactly the same mind process that creates outer Maya. A core teaching of Buddhism is that our “self,” our personality/ego, is nothing more than an aggregation of outside influences that cluster together in our minds like shiny stones gathered into a pile, and which we mistake not only for something “real,” but tragically, for our essential selves. Yet this “pile” has nothing really to do with who we are at all. Buddhism teaches “no-self.” Belief in the illusion of a unique and independent “self” is our greatest obstacle to enlightenment. Wasting time and energy getting to “know yourself” in the Western sense is foreign to Eastern thought. Casspriano again does a great job of translating the Buddhist concept of “no-self” into Western scientific/spiritual terminology. He shows the process by which our ego/personality aggregate “piles up,” as well as how to take the pile down, stone by stone. Enlightenment is what the pile was covering up, and so it naturally appears as soon as the pile is removed – but oh how we cling to our personal pile of stones! “Self” is what we must trade for enlightenment, what must be surrendered, and Casspriano returns to this truth many times in the simplest path. My point is that the one star reviewer’s reduction of the simplest path to “know yourself” has no basis at all in the actual book.
As to the book being “gimmicky”: Yes, the words “The Simplest Path” recur frequently throughout the book, but not in reference to the book itself (at least that’s not how I took it), but rather to the system of understanding the mind and working toward “awakening” Casspriano is describing – and it is a complete system that deserves to be considered as a whole, on its own. At times the repetition does have a feel of “branding” in the commercial sense, so I understand where the reviewer may have taken his impression. But the simplest path, while resonant with Zen Buddhism (and apparently, according to Casspriano, with the Toltec philosophy espoused by Carlos Castaneda, of which I have no personal knowledge, so I’ll have to take the author’s word for that) is far enough different that it needs its own “name” to set it apart from other schools of similar but not identical thought. The reviewer’s criticism is like saying that every use of the term “Zen” in a book called “Zen Buddhism” should be taken as a reference to the book, and not to the larger practice of Zen Buddhism as a spiritual discipline that the book is describing. Casspriano’s point in repeatedly linking The Simplest Path, Zen Buddhism and Toltec Shamanism throughout the book, at least as I understood it, is to highlight these three spiritual practices as related reliable paths through a dark forest of illusion, a forest in which many apparent (and more popular) paths, including most (all?) religious beliefs, actively vie to mislead travelers toward deeper ensnarement in the dream, rather than leading them toward “awakening.”
I want to say a word about koan study in Rienzi Zen and how it relates to the simplest path. Koans are those quirky Zen sayings and stories like “what is the sound of one hand clapping?” or “what was your original face before you (or your parents) were born?” that have no rational answer, and which Zen students turn and turn in their minds like the tumblers of a combination lock until their imprisoned psyches “explode” in a “super-rational” experience of reality beyond the illusion (“irrational” would be the wrong term, as that implies “nonsense”). That “super-rational” vision of reality is called “kensho.” I have experienced it myself, more than once in my lifetime. I have come to think of Casspriano’s “Key Questions” in the second half of the simplest path, especially the later seven of the ten, as “cultural koans” designed to trigger “collective kensho” for the whole human race at once. Like “what is the sound of one hand clapping?”, unflinching consideration of the value of human life, of how our beliefs about the future shape the present, of the true origin and destiny of life on Earth, etc., especially as seen through the lens of Casspriano’s “Key Question Technique,” reveals that none of these questions have rational answers, yet all require our active and immediate response. Successful resolution of these larger riddles that impact everyone will require us all to eventually “explode” into reality, together, in a “super-rational” way. We’ll have to break through the illusion and wake up together, as one (which has been the goal of Mahayana Buddhism, of which Zen is a sect, since around 200 BCE). That is the “Planetary Awakening” addressed in this book, and I believe Casspriano’s “Key Questions” are a concrete step in that direction. I’m glad I spent my fifteen dollars.
This is my “old man” take on the simplest path, having encountered it after 30 years of Zen Buddhist practice (I’m not veering off my chosen path here, just bowing respectfully in passing toward Casspriano’s). From a Buddhist perspective, the simplest path is true Dharma, though I do not get the impression from reading his book that Vincent Casspriano is himself a Buddhist or a follower of any religion. That to my mind makes his book all the more interesting.
Rating: 5 / 5
# 22 February 2010 at 12:00 am

Quantum Leap! said:
This is a thoughtful book that addresses how we may go about developing a process to question our everyday consensus reality. I suppose if I have learned anything in 49 years of life, it is that all personal and social problems stem from our fundamental views on the nature of reality itself. Vincent Casspriano uses the concept of a “meme” as a fundamental unit of ideas, assumptions, etc. that often block our understanding of reality itself. One such meme, for example, may be that we have to “fight for our freedom” or the world’s a “fearful” place and hence, we have to be ready to kill to protect ourselves. I suppose you could also use the word “paradigm” here as well, but the essential point of this book is that we “unconsciously” function in our life with many limited points of view that block our ability to solve problems on both a personal and a social basis.
While Vince Casspriano is to be congradulated for producing a book that presents both a methodology and a motivation for personal transformation, there are a few pitfalls here that the potential reader should be aware of before tackling this material. The author has some rather strong views on fossil fuel consumption, meet consumption, and the role of humans in the cycle of procreation. While I generally agree with his analysis on fossil fuel consumtion and meat consumption (as I have viewed large tracks of deforrested grazing land in developing countries), these viewpoints can distract the reader from the essential point here which is to rigourously question consensus reality. Since I am single, and have no motivation to have children, I definitely disagree with his views on the necessity of human procreation on this planet, but here again, it is important to extract the essential meaning rather than get caught in the specific political/social debates that these issues may spawn.
If you are serious about personal transformation with the potential for changing our global consciousness, than this book can be an invaluable tool. I do agree with the Author that a world population of “high functioning” people can resolve every planetary problem we face today. As we systematically question our consensus reality, we will see our problems in new ways, and with this new perspective, problems can often be quickly resolved or transcended.


Rating: 4 / 5
# 22 February 2010 at 12:14 am

Leave your response!

Recent Posts

• True Blood Season 4: An Important Message from The Cast (HBO)
• The Vampire Diaries Promo 3×13 – Bringing Out the Dead [HD]
• Twilight Saga Trio – Best of 2011
• Real Vampires: From Psychics to Sanguines
• True Blood: Pam doesn’t care about your problems

Recent Forum Posts

• No Topics to Display